Christian Hacking

ChristianHacking.com is an accountability and transparency site focused on Christian Hacking's public claims and journalistic conduct, especially where it intersects with Lighthouse Global and related work.

Christian Hacking has described himself as a "very amateur" journalist, and this site treats that self-positioning as a central context for evaluating method, standards, and accountability.

This is a temporary homepage while we assemble the full evidence library, timeline, and detailed pages. Our intention is simple: correcting the record (fully and comprehensively), along with a full right of reply to all claims made.

Some Christians have wanted to understand how our actions are in line with the guidance on handling conflict given in God's living Word.

Through our explanations, our brothers and sisters understood our rationale and respected the steps we have taken.

You can read a more comprehensive breakdown here.

Mr Hacking remains in all of our prayers, that he repents for the damage he has caused, the wrongs he has conducted, and those he intends to. It is our most sincere and earnest hope and prayer that we come to know Mr Hacking as a true brother in the Spirit of our Lord.

Featured statement

Why Lighthouse Global Was Attacked by the Establishment

A Statement by Paul S. Waugh

Read the Full Statement

What this page documents

This page is a structured introduction to the accountability record surrounding Christian Hacking's public claims, journalistic conduct, and the way Lighthouse Global and related matters have been represented to audiences.

It is not presented as a final library. It is the front door: a concise statement of concern, scope, and editorial posture while the wider evidence base, chronology, and source pages are assembled in public.

The central question is not whether a commentator is polished. The question is whether serious public claims have been made carefully, fairly, truthfully, and with a level of accountability proportionate to the harm those claims can cause.

Why Christian Hacking matters

Christian Hacking has spoken publicly about Lighthouse Global, its people, and related events in ways that invite scrutiny. Once a person takes on the practical role of journalist, investigator, or public narrator, standards matter even if that person describes himself as "very amateur".

Public accusations and framing can influence reputations, relationships, and third-party decisions.
Errors become more serious when they are repeated, amplified, or insulated from meaningful correction.
Journalistic transparency is not optional when the subject matter involves contested allegations, vulnerable people, and potentially life-altering consequences.

Areas under review

Verification standards: whether claims were tested against source documents, conflicting evidence, and the motives of those supplying information.

Fair representation: whether Lighthouse Global, its members, and related events were presented in ways that were accurate, proportionate, and open to correction.

Public accountability: whether substantive challenges, counter-evidence, and requests for clarification were addressed or sidestepped.

Method and ethics: whether an amateur-journalist posture was used as context for humility or as a shield against the standards normally expected when making serious allegations.

What readers should expect next

Evidence Library Source documents, statements, timelines, and linked materials will be organised into a navigable record instead of remaining dispersed across posts and discussions.
Chronology A date-led timeline will show what was said, what was known at the time, what was contested, and what changed after challenge or disclosure.
Right Of Reply Any substantive response from Christian Hacking will be published in full, alongside the relevant record, rather than selectively quoted.
Corrections If any claim on this site is shown to be wrong, it will be corrected openly and traceably. The standard sought from others will be applied here too.

Our editorial commitment

This site is not intended as a smear page or a slogan page. It is intended as a record-correction page. That means focusing on evidence, keeping claims attributable, distinguishing fact from interpretation, and documenting both response and silence.

We will publish carefully. Material will be added in a structured way, not through vague implication or rhetorical escalation.

We will publish replies in full. Any meaningful response from Christian Hacking will be included alongside the record it addresses.

We will document non-response. If significant questions remain unanswered, that absence will form part of the public record.

We will keep proportion. The aim is accountability and clarity, not exaggeration, pile-on, or careless accusation.

Latest News Articles

Recent external coverage and related updates from our News Articles feed.

Loading latest articles...